Nike Air Zoom Mercurial F.G.

Advantages: Lightweight, Long-lasting, Comfortable
Disadvantages: Little protection from injury

...is no substitute for the Nike Air Zoom Mercurials. With a pricetag of over £100 they are expensive, but will prove tremendous value for money in the long term. I've had my pair for two years now, but you wouldn't know it apart from the studs being slightly worn down. The best feature of the boots is how little they weigh (approx 185g), giving you the feeling of being able to run faster and accelerate away or towards an opponent. The shape of the ...
...you can say about these boots is that because they are so lightweight and the leather so thin, they offer little structural resistance/protection injury. However, this is a relitevely minor issue and I would definately recommend the Nike Air Zoom Mercurials to anybody considering buying firm ground football boots. ... Read review

Advantages: durable, light, comfy and waterproof
Disadvantages: bit expensive

...I wrong. I've always chosen Nike boots over any other one even though most of my friends prefer adidis. Since I play quite a lot and mainly in the wet (I live in Scotland), they needed to be waterproof and they had to last because of the price. These Nikes are the lightest I have ever worn. I don't know what material they are made of, but it's darn good and lasting even though they feel like they can be ripped apart by bare hands. I have already ...
...because my old pair of nike didn't last very long and my toe burst through them. On all of my other boots, they weren't waterproof for very long. Well, with the Nikes, I do not see any sign of the toe wearing down, and are waterproof to this day but I do use dubbin on them to help it along a little. I think I have found the boots I wouldn't mind buying over and over again when they finally wear out or I grow out of, instead of experimenting with ... Read review

Advantages: Light, strong material variety of sizes
Disadvantages: expensive

...sizes nike produce you can pretty much get what you want. Just for your info I purchased mine from www.prodirectsoccer.com. They we delivered within 4 working days so service is good. They also offer for an additional £19.99 for your name and number to be stiched on. Goodluck. ... Read review

Advantages: Light, Increase speed and control.
Disadvantages: Lack of protection

...enough for other people. The nike skin technology provides great control over the ball and allowing the actual boot to weigh a mere 194 grams, the lightest boots to date. The overall design of the boot is superb and with the wide range of colours there is a boot out there to suit you. The Nike mercurial vapor is worn by such stars as Thierry Henry and Ronaldo, this just shows the high quality on offer. The boot oozes class and flair and with these ... Read review

Advantages: Durable, easy to clean comfortable
Disadvantages: price

These nike are Mercurials are very very trendy, nice looking light and durable. Of all the Nike boots these are without a doubt the most value for mone even though they are too expensive. They cost average £110, I know just for a piece of footwear! I have had all the other Nike models in this range, which cost the same amount. The first model was poor the only thing good about them was that they look good!. The second model not as bad, they look ...
...Nike Air Zoom Mercurial F.G. - These boots worn by Roberto carlos and "Me". have all the real qualities of a boot made for football rather than posing. I can only sing there praise if you want a good pair of pro NIKE boots these are the ones. They are also very easy to clean! What can I say if your a person than likes your boots to feel good and you like nike buy these. I have just started to appreciate comfort in boots my self, I prefered good looking ... Read review