Nike Mercurial II SG

Advantages: Very Light, good quality and very cheap.
Disadvantages: Not very comfortable.

Nike Mercurial Vapor II SG was being worn by the world fastest and greatest footballers such as Ronaldo, Cristiano Ronaldo, Thierry Henry and more. It is superlight weighing only 200g and it's handmade from Italy. It used to be the lightest football boot but was outrun by the Nike Mercurial Vapor III which only weighs around 185g but Nike Mercurial Vapor II is still a good choice cause it is stylish definitely cheap and your money worth. It is made ...
...or a professional player the Nike Mercurial Vapor II SG is a good choice for every type of player. The Studs provides perfect agility and acceleration giving you the player a head start on all the others. You can buy this product at eBay for just 20£ to 40£ and on prodirectsoccer.com for 29.99£. If red is not your favorite color you can get the Nike Mercurial Vapor II in different colors such as blue, silver, yellow, gold and many more. I used to ... Read review

Advantages: light good looking
Disadvantages: scrath easily

I am not doing the nike mercurials 2 i am doing the nke merurials iv . I had to do do it with this image as there was no other ones for the iv Introduction Nike mercurial vapour iv is the new boots made by nike released this year . It is endorsed by the very best players like ronaldo drogba and many others . The nike mercurial vapours iv are the lightest shoes made by nike or anyone yet . The look The nike mercurials look absaloutly stunning . They ...
...any colour you want from nike id which is something that i would strongly as the shoes are new and not many people are wearing them so if you change the colours people might think that they are fake The nike mercurials are the best looking nike boots yet the colours are black and blue and orange and black i have the black and blue and my brother has the orange and black . These shoes make people notice so if you want to stand out and make people ... Read review

Advantages: Light, Stylish, Professionally endorsed
Disadvantages: Thin leather which can lead to injuries

...placed unlike other nike football boots and are metal studs encased in high density plastic. Replacement studs are easily accsessible from retailers such as JJB sports and leading sports shops. In general I would say if you can try these boots before you purchase as they arent for everyone. ... Read review

Advantages: Light, stylish
Disadvantages: not the strongest of boots, slightly uncomfortable

...stud system, unique to the nike boots. This means that the length of the stud, can be changed by the player with a key in a matter of seconds - ideal for different surface conditions! Disadvantages? Well the boot is not suited for really hitting the ball from a set piece - in my opinion I find it harder to strike the ball quite as well, or at least with as much feel, as I do with a leather option. The stats: Material: NikeSkin - super lightweight ...
...Peeva Fitform sockliner with Poron TM Inserts Nylon sole plate Shape: Full Speedtract plate for extra speed and flex Shaped to foot and arched for a better fit Heel piece to help keep foot in place and protect Weight: Extremely light - under 200g! ... Read review

Advantages: Light weight, Attractive colours
Disadvantages: Narrow

...team have a pair of Nike Mercurials and I can see why. When I was looking for a new pair of boots, I went to my nearest sports retailers and tried on many pairs of boots looking for the right ones for me. I tried on a pair of Mercurials and I was surprised at how light weight they were, they honestly felt like I weren't wearing them! Infact the boots weight less than 200g!!! They offer superb fit and moulds around the foot. This offers a great ...
...boots aren't only fashionable but offer great comfort and great touch and control on the pitch. I highly recommend the Nike Mercurial II SG as the ultimate football boots. The price is also very reasonable as you are paying for quality and are cheap when compared to Adidas' rival preditors. ... Read review