Reebok I Run +

...write a review about the Reebok I Run +, mainly because I wanted to highlight the difference between this runner compared to the more expensive models out there. The last runner I reviewed was the Horizon Elite 507 which came in at a touch over £1000. This is an expensive treadmill, but it came with everything you need from a running machine. The Reebok I Run + is considerably cheaper, but as the old saying goes, “You get what you pay for”, in this ...
...are paying for it. Clearly Reebok understand that on any runner, this is the most important bit. The key word here is “continuous motor”. This basically means two things. One the motor will not short out after continual use (many peak motors will cut out as they have an inbuilt thermostat to prevent overheating), you will comfortably get two hours of continual training out of the motor (Important if you‘re training for marathons). Secondly continuous ... more

Ok I thought I would write a review about the Reebok I Run +, mainly because I wanted to highlight the difference between this runner compared to the more expensive models out there. The last runner I reviewed was the Horizon Elite 507 which came in at a touch over £1000. This is an expensive treadmill, but it came with everything you need from a running machine. The Reebok I Run + is considerably cheaper, but as the old saying goes, “You get what you pay for”, in this case, a running machine that does half a job. Let me explain.

SPECIFICATIONS

1.75 horsepower (HP) continuous

Now the engine on this machine is actually not bad for the money you are paying for it. Clearly Reebok understand that on any runner, this is the most important bit. The key word here is “continuous motor”. This basically means two things. One the motor will not short out after continual use (many peak motors will cut out as they have an inbuilt thermostat to prevent overheating), you will comfortably get two hours of continual training out of the motor (Important if you‘re training for marathons). Secondly continuous motors maintain an even level of speed much better than peak motors. A peak motor’s speed that is said to be travelling at 10km/h could be as low as 8kph or as high as 12km/h, therefore its not giving a true account of the actual speed. This is not helpful if you are training for a timed race like a marathon. 1.75 horsepower is just about adequate (more expensive machines have a 2.5/3 HP motor), this is reflected in the top speed below.

0 - 14 km/H speed range (0 - 8.6 mph)

This is a real worry for me, 8.6mph (14km/h) is not that quick. This really alienates this piece of kit, as anybody who is slightly above average in their running would not be serviced well from this machine. In particular, the machine would be fairly useless for club/elite athletes running shorter long distance races (800m, 1500m, 3000m) because the speed would be too low. The machine is geared towards longer distances and would have enough basic speed for the average marathon trainer or someone looking to lose weight/build up basic stamina. Just to give you a clearer picture. I am a regular gym goer but definitely not a massive fan of running. In my training (20minute warm up) I would run between 12 and 14 km/h which is the top end of this machine! If I wanted to actually train specifically to improve my running, the machine does not offer enough progression through its basic speed.

Two level manual incline

To achieve the same level of resistance as running outside, a treadmills incline has to be increased by 2%. This machine covers this very basic incline, however does not offer any opportunity for a steeper incline. I do see this as a big problem. For example, for many people out there in particular those wanting to lose weight or the elderly, they may be starting their exercise regime by just walking. Generally a trainer will then increase their programme by either increasing the speed (Not really that suitable for elderly or obese clients) or by increasing the level of incline (Much better way to increase the intensity without increasing the speed). Therefore with only two levels of incline, this machine is once again very limited.

Large LCD display with back light

Quite a sexy little display and easy to navigate. The screen is clear enough and shows the basic variables of time/distance/heart rate/calories. No frills but shows the basics.

6 pre-set programme

This is the biggest clue into the design of the machine, nearly all of the programmes are geared towards weight loss as opposed to improved aerobic performance. Again the more expensive machines give you far more options to help a) keep your training interesting b) keep you improving. If you’re the type of person who only really uses the manual speed settings then this machine is fine. If you like working to pre-set programmes then this machine is adequate but limited.

Wheels for portability

This really is an industry standard on treadmills now. It does help with moving the machine around, all be it this machine is incredibly light (I’ll come onto that in a minute!)

Hand grip heart rate monitor

Again this is standard for most runners these days. Two metallic handles on the bar in front of you. Not the easiest to use at higher speeds and I’m also a little sceptical of how accurate they are. I prefer a separate heart rate watch and strap if your serious about heart rate training, they offer more functionality and are definitely more accurate.

40 x 125 cm walking/running surface

Now this is really small, infact, it is THE smallest running surface I’ve come across! Now essentially this shouldn’t be a problem because on a running machine, your stride come into play that much because the running belt is moving for you (Essentially your running in the same spot the whole time). However, the length of the stride is not the issue here. it’s the width that is a problem. You would only have to have a slight loss of concentration and one of your feet could hit the side of the machine, propelling you head first into the attractive dial at the front! Seriously this happens often in gyms when people start getting tired or are checking someone out on the other machines! There is not much room for error on this machine! That said, on a plus point, the machine is extremely small making it easy to store away.

Foldable for easy storage

As mentioned above, the machine is easy to store and will practically fit under your bed it is so narrow. The running deck lifts up easily and the wheels make it easy to manoeuvre.

Available in 5 colours

Not much to say about this, the white and orange design is by far the best, this is a good looking piece of kit. Definitely marketed toward the ladies I think.

Maximum user weight 100kg (220 lbs)

This could be an issue for some. 100kg is a reasonable user weight recommendation, however the machine would definitely be exposed if its being used by a heavier individual. The machine itself only weighs 60kg in a bid to be lightweight and functional. It does mean that if you are in the 100kg weight bracket, this machine in my opinion would not be sturdy enough and I would definitely suggested a more robust machine like anything built by York.

161 (L) x 80 (W) x 131 (H) cm floor
159 (L) x 80 (W) x 47 (H) cm folded

Now this is extremely small for a runner and I commend Reebok for their space saving design. However this has one major floor…………the weight.

Machine weight 60kg

At 60kg, this machine is one of the lightest on the market. This is sold as a plus as its small, easy to store away etc. However in terms of its use it exposes its biggest downside. Even on mlight jogging I found that the machine was a) a touch noisy and b) It did not feel sturdy. In fact with every increase in speed, the machine became less and less sturdy. This really was disappointing (The reason I didn’t purchase it!), because its not doing the most basic of jobs. It felt cheap, you had none of the assurance and confidence that a sturdier machine gives you and your left thinking the machines build quality is poor. This is a major pitfall with this machine.

COST

The cost of this machine did not change significantly wherever I looked……but be aware there is a new model (I Run +) and an old model. Very similar but this review is on the newer model. This is reflected in the price.

Fitness-superstore.co.uk £349 Old model (I Run)
Kelkoo £349 Old model (I Run)
Amazon £449 New model (I Run +)

In conclusion, the Reebok I Run + is a cheaper alternative for those who wish to incorporate running into their home exercise regime. It is half the price of its more illustrious competitors, but you get half the build quality and functionality. This machine is ideal for beginners to average runners, however has too many limitations for the more experienced runner. I think Its a split recommendation depending on who's looking to buy it and for what purpose.

Overall 6/10

I hope this information helps,

Kind Regards,

Logan
 

...less