Nike Mercurial Vapor II is 2 FAST 2 FURIOUS!
Review of Nike Mercurial II SG by
kofi_goso
Advantages: Very Light, good quality and very cheap.
Disadvantages: Not very comfortable.
...Nike Mercurial Vapor II SG was being worn by the world fastest and greatest footballers such as Ronaldo, Cristiano Ronaldo, Thierry Henry and more. It is superlight weighing only 200g and it's handmade from Italy. It used to be the lightest football boot but was outrun by the Nike Mercurial Vapor III which only weighs around 185g but Nike Mercurial Vapor II is still a good choice cause it is stylish definitely cheap and your money worth. It is made out of Nike Skin which is a superlight and very thin material. Lightweight performance boot doesn't matter if you are a Sunday league or a professional player the Nike Mercurial Vapor II SG is a good choice for every type of player. The Studs provides perfect agility and acceleration giving you the player a head start on all the others. You can buy this product at eBay for just 20£ to 40...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average very helpful
|
|
very helpful
26.03.2008
|
Mercurial R9
Review of Nike Air Zoom Mercurial F.G. by
zarniwoop
Advantages: durable, light, comfy and waterproof
Disadvantages: bit expensive
...These have to be the best boots I have ever bought and used. When I ordered my boots out of my mag I though they would be like any old boot but boy was I wrong. I've always chosen Nike boots over any other one even though most of my friends prefer adidis. Since I play quite a lot and mainly in the wet (I live in Scotland), they needed to be waterproof and they had to last because of the price.
These Nikes are the lightest I have ever worn. I don't know what material they are made of, but it's darn good and lasting even though they feel like they can be ripped apart by bare hands. I have already used them for a month and they are still nice and shiney after a little wash.
The main reason I bought new boots is because my old pair of nike didn't last very long and my toe burst through them. On all of my other boots, they weren...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
17.10.2001
|
Probably the best firm ground boots ever
Review of Nike Air Zoom Mercurial F.G. by
beanie8844
Advantages: Lightweight, Long-lasting, Comfortable
Disadvantages: Little protection from injury
...As a football coach who also plays competitvely twice a week my choice of football boots is extremely important. When playing on soft ground I use the new Adidas F50+ boots, but when the ground is hard there is no substitute for the Nike Air Zoom Mercurials. With a pricetag of over £100 they are expensive, but will prove tremendous value for money in the long term. I've had my pair for two years now, but you wouldn't know it apart from the studs being slightly worn down.
The best feature of the boots is how little they weigh (approx 185g), giving you the feeling of being able to run faster and accelerate away or towards an opponent. The shape of the boots and the soft leather make a great contact surface with the football for accurate passing and shooting. They are also extremely comfortable to wear.
The only negative thing you can...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
06.03.2008
|
Lightweight and Stylish
Review of Nike Mercurial II SG by
KPN7
Advantages: Light, Stylish, Professionally endorsed
Disadvantages: Thin leather which can lead to injuries
.... however this would add weight to the boot therefore it comes down to swings and roundabouts as the saying goes.
The studs underneath the boot are correctly placed unlike other nike football boots and are metal studs encased in high density plastic. Replacement studs are easily accsessible from retailers such as JJB sports and leading sports shops.
In general I would say if you can try these boots before you purchase as they arent for everyone....
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
30.10.2007
|
Trainer Heaven
Review of Nike Total 90 T.F. by
mercedes007
Advantages: comfy looks good
Disadvantages: None
...Absoloutely amazing.That is how I would describe this most recent piece of technology by nike. This boot mat well be an astro turf boot but this is one boot that will not be forgotten for a while. Its said to be just like wearing a foot sock playing in them, and I agree.
The level of comfort in these astroturfs is outstanding, I have never played in such comfortable boots. They have enhanced cushioning on the soles and the heels and can be worn for casual use or for playing football. For me, they are great for both.
They are a very attractive boot and playing in them not only feels good, but it also looks good. The tongue on them is an automatic fold over, so it doesn't mean you have to be trying for hours to keep the tongue down on them. There is a vast choice of colours including, blue, red, yellow, aluminium silver and black...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
31.07.2002
|
Beautiful boots for the beautiful game
Review of Nike Mercurial II SG by
DJGraham
Advantages: Light weight, Attractive colours
Disadvantages: Narrow
...These boots were highly recommended to me by lots of people and part time footballers I know.
Being a teenage boy, I love playing football and spend alot of time training and competing. Quite a few players from my team have a pair of Nike Mercurials and I can see why.
When I was looking for a new pair of boots, I went to my nearest sports retailers and tried on many pairs of boots looking for the right ones for me. I tried on a pair of Mercurials and I was surprised at how light weight they were, they honestly felt like I weren't wearing them! Infact the boots weight less than 200g!!!
They offer superb fit and moulds around the foot. This offers a great touch and feel when playing football. The boots have made my game more consistent and gives me more confidence when playing. Now I can strut around the pitch like Thierry Henry...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
23.10.2006
|
The Boot!
Review of Adidas Predator Precision by
JOSH1007
Advantages: Maybe they curl the ball.
Disadvantages: Maybe they dont
...is this boot the boot of all boots allot of famous and not so famous footballers thimk so. the would knows about david beckhams great free kicks but is that his skill or the boot. if it is the boot how come hes getting all the money and not someone else and how come there isnt anyone else as good as him. i must admit my boots help curl a football around the wall but why? what do those little things do.many other footballers can curl a ball just as good and they dont waer addidas predators.
Rivaldo wears mizuno.
roberto carlos wears nike.
and the list goes on so are they just a rip off or do they really work....
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
12.09.2000
|
nike mercurial iv
Review of Nike Mercurial II SG by
betterthenever
Advantages: light good looking
Disadvantages: scrath easily
...I am not doing the nike mercurials 2 i am doing the nke merurials iv . I had to do do it with this image as there was no other ones for the iv
Introduction
Nike mercurial vapour iv is the new boots made by nike released this year . It is endorsed by the very best players like ronaldo drogba and many others . The nike mercurial vapours iv are the lightest shoes made by nike or anyone yet .
The look
The nike mercurials look absaloutly stunning . They are availabble in two colours at the moment from the shop but for a lot more money you can now personalise them to any colour you want from nike id which is something that i would strongly as the shoes are new and not many people are wearing them so if you change the colours people might think that they are fake
The nike mercurials are the best looking nike boots yet the colours...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
14.04.2008
|
Nike mercurial vapor II
Review of Nike Mercurial II SG by
davezzzzz
Advantages: Light, stylish
Disadvantages: not the strongest of boots, slightly uncomfortable
...these boots are aimed at the highre end of the market - they do offer slight take down versions such as the talaria, which are pretty similar and unless you are playing at a high level, dare I say you could hardly tell the difference!
Comfort...
I must admit I found these boots rubbed slightly against my heel but I suppose that varies from person to person and the newer version of this boot has been adapted to cope with any rubbing or blistering.
Other Features?
This boot does feature the snap stud system, unique to the nike boots. This means that the length of the stud, can be changed by the player with a key in a matter of seconds - ideal for different surface conditions!
Disadvantages?
Well the boot is not suited for really hitting the ball from a set piece - in my opinion I find it harder to strike the ball quite as well, or at least...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
02.05.2007
|
Total 90 = 90/90
Review of Nike Total 90 T.F. by
jackiechan
Advantages: Comfortable, Stylish and Good Price
Disadvantages: None
...I bought these off the internet from a shop called kitbag.com, it is full of great deals, boots, shirts and accesories for all of your sporting needs.
**Description**
These are a great buy for any price, they come in red, grey or blue, they are made by the company, NIke. They are a ferm but comfortable pair of trainers that can be used on grass and Astro-Turf. The sole of the shoe have tiny, stud-like bumps on the bottom, they are especially made for Astro-Turf. The side, Nike tick on the side, with small 'total 90' written on the back of the side. The heel is grey, blue or red with another small Nike tick. The laces are grey, red or blue with a strip of the colour down the front. The tongue, it is the colour of the boot with small 'total 90' written on it.
**Price/Availability**
I got these at a fantastically cheap price of £29...
Read review
Ciao members have rated this review on average helpful
|
|
helpful
29.04.2004
(09.05.2004) |